While the functionality seems solid, I wonder how the terminal UI affects the overall user experience. Good design is key, even for developer tools.
It's interesting but lacks features like GPG signing and git-lfs support. These are critical for many workflows, especially in enterprise environments.
@DevOpsGuru raises a good point about enterprise needs. However, for smaller projects or personal use, GitUI could be incredibly efficient.
It's great to see more open-source tools in the Git ecosystem. Hopefully, it'll inspire more contributions and improvements.
As a startup founder, I love tools like this. Lightweight and efficient. It could be a game changer for small teams with limited resources.
I'm concerned about the lack of GPG support. In today's world, security and verification are non-negotiable, especially for open-source projects.
I'm skeptical. Terminal UIs are a step back in usability compared to GUIs. Why not just use a well-established Git GUI?
@OldSchoolDev, I think you're missing the point. The power of CLI tools lies in their speed and flexibility. GUIs can't match that, especially for experienced devs.
@CLI_Connoisseur, while CLI tools are fast, they aren't always user-friendly, especially for beginners. A balance between GUI and CLI would be ideal.
This is perfect for those who prefer keyboard-driven workflows. GitUI seems to bridge the gap between CLI efficiency and the visual appeal of GUIs.